Talking about someone who is not in the room is a common part of everyday conversation. It can help people exchange information, understand social situations or discuss a shared concern. But when gossip becomes frequent or is used to damage someone’s reputation, the reasons behind it may be more complicated than simple curiosity. A new study published in the journal Behavioral Sciences has found that psychopathy was the strongest predictor of how frequently people gossiped, even when researchers accounted for other dark personality traits, including narcissism.The study, ‘The Dark Tetrad Traits Differentially Predict Gossip Frequency and Motives’ was conducted by Adam C. Davis of Canadore College, Tracy Vaillancourt of the University of Ottawa and Steven Arnocky of Nipissing University.
What the researchers found
The researchers surveyed 516 adults from the United States and Canada, whose average age was about 38. Participants answered questions about their personality traits, how often they talked about people who were absent and why they engaged in gossip. The study examined four traits known collectively as the ‘Dark Tetrad’: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy and everyday sadism.Narcissism is associated with an inflated sense of self-importance and a desire for admiration. Machiavellianism involves strategic manipulation of others for personal gain. Psychopathy, as measured in personality research, is associated with traits such as callousness and reduced concern for other people. Everyday sadism refers to finding pleasure in others’ discomfort or suffering.All four traits were linked to more frequent gossiping when examined individually. However, when the researchers accounted for the overlap between the traits, psychopathy emerged as the strongest predictor of gossip frequency. Everyday sadism, narcissism and Machiavellianism also contributed, but their associations were weaker.The researchers reported that the combined statistical model accounted for 52% of the variation in participants’ gossip-frequency scores. This does not mean that personality explains every instance of gossip, or that the researchers could predict any individual’s behaviour with certainty.
Not everyone gossips for the same reason
AI representation/ChatGPT
The study also examined the motives behind gossip, including gathering information, enjoying social conversation, influencing someone’s reputation and protecting members of a group. The findings showed that the traits were associated with different motives. Machiavellianism was the only trait that independently predicted gossiping to gather or verify information. It was also associated with gossiping for social enjoyment and with the other motives examined.Narcissism independently predicted gossiping for entertainment or social enjoyment, but its association with malicious gossip did not remain significant after the researchers accounted for the other traits. Psychopathy, meanwhile, was the strongest predictor of gossip intended to damage someone’s reputation. Everyday sadism was also associated with this motive. Psychopathy was additionally linked to gossip used to protect one’s group.These findings suggest that frequent gossiping and malicious gossiping are related but not identical behaviours. Someone may discuss absent people to exchange information, while another person may use the same social activity to undermine a rival.
Does gossip always mean something negative ?
Photo: Canva
Not necessarily. The researchers noted that gossip is often treated as inherently harmful, even though it can include positive and neutral information as well as criticism or rumours. People may discuss an absent colleague’s achievement, share news about a mutual friend or try to understand a confusing social situation. Such conversations are not automatically malicious.The more important thing is what is being shared, why it is being shared and what effect it may have on the person being discussed. Gossip becomes more concerning when someone repeatedly spreads damaging claims, humiliates others or uses private information to influence how a group sees a person.The study’s results should also be interpreted with care. Participants reported their own personality traits and gossiping habits through questionnaires. Such responses may not always accurately reflect how people behave in everyday life. The study was also based on data collected at one point in time, so it cannot establish that psychopathy causes people to gossip more. Nor does frequent gossip mean that a person has psychopathy.
What the findings mean in everyday life
The findings offer one way to understand why gossip can serve very different purposes. For some people, it may be a way to exchange information or feel connected to a group. For others, it may be used strategically or to hurt someone’s standing among friends or colleagues. Rather than judging a person by a single conversation, it is more useful to notice a repeated pattern: whether they routinely spread unverified claims, share private details without permission or appear to enjoy another person’s embarrassment.